14
Aug
2008
Posted by Robert as Ramblings/Miscellaneous
In that same vein, I thought it would be interesting to come up with a list of products that have failed. With failed products, you know something went wrong. And that something is often an insulated product creation process . . . the drive to create a perfect product without determining how the market will respond to it.
Here is a list of 10 famous products that have failed:
1)Â New Coke
Probably the most famous of failed products. I think Bill Cosby even helped promote New Coke. How could it have gone so horribly wrong?? Not that hard, really. Why make a new Coke when the old Coke was pretty darn good to begin with?
If it isn’t broken, chances are it doesn’t need to be fixed. Â
2)Â Crystal Pepsi
Crystal Pepsi actually was going strong, and, for a little while, it looked like it had some staying power. But in the end, the problem here was the same problem with New Coke. If regular Pepsi was doing just fine, why create a similar-tasting, caffeine-free, clear Pepsi?? There was no market need for it.Â
Apparently, the thinking was to target those Pepsi drinkers who were concerned about drinking (a) a dark-colored soda that (b) had loads of caffeine in it. The flaw in this thinking, however, was that Pepsi drinkers didn’t really care about that kind of stuff.   Â
3) McDonald’s Arch Deluxe Burger

I barely remember this one. From what I learned, McDonald’s was trying to target adults with this . . . ahem . . . “fine cuisine.” So they offered a burger that was a little better than their regular rat meat burgers and charged significantly more for it. Presto! You have a failed product.Â
The lesson for Micky D’s here is that, if you offer cheap grub food at dirt cheap prices and make millions of dollars doing it, why change? Let the “adults” go somewhere else for fine cuisine. You have your market. Don’t mess with a good thing.
4) Polaroid Instant Film
I don’t know about you, but I hated taking a Polaroid picture and then standing around shaking the picture waiting to see how it came out. That was just plain annoying.Â
So, with that image in my head, it’s no surprise that the “instant film” product didn’t pan out. It doesn’t sound like a fair association. But it wasn’t just a result of that. The failure of Polaroid Instant Film was also due to the emergence of digital photography.Â
5) Levi’s Type 1 Jeans
This was quite the marketing blunder. A commercial for these jeans aired a few years ago during the Super Bowl, and it sort of missed the mark. Look at the picture (from the commercial) on the right. Does the image of a guy covered in dirt and riding an out-of-control car rodeo style make you want to buy a pair of jeans?Â
I couldn’t think of a more classic example of why you should let the market determine what kind of product you put out.
6) Ford Edsel
My parents were just children when the 1958 Edsel hit the market. I’ve read about a variety of reasons why this car tanked. Supposedly, the front of the vehicle was just plain ugly.Â
The name itself (”Edsel”) didn’t catch on.  There was also something about a weird pricing strategy. Â
7) IBM PCjr
The IBM PCjr was IBM’s first attempt at entering the market for inexpensive home-use personal computers. The problem? At $699, it was twice as expensive as the Atari 8-bit family computer and Commodore 64 computer.Â
Its keyboard was also a sore point. IBM used an infrared wireless chiclet keyboard, which was similar to that of a pocket calculator. It had wide spaces between keys to leave room for instructional overlays bundled with software packages. Consumers thought it felt cheap and made it difficult to type on.  It only had 62 keys, and it lacked the numeric keypad and separate function keys of the original IBM PC. IBM eventually replaced it for free with a different wireless keyboard with more conventional keys.    Â
8)Â Sony Betamax
My father-in-law has a whole collection of beta tapes. In 1975, this product was a breakthrough. But it just didn’t catch on.  Betamax was the big fish in the small pool at first, but VHS eventually won the war with humility and smart engineering and pricing.Â
This fierce format war pitted Sony and its attempt to dictate an industry standard against JVC and its gutsy decision to develop its own technology. The result was the emergence of VHS and control of 70% of the North American market. By 1984, over 40 companies decided to use a VCR-compatible format. In addition, VHS camcorders were more affordable. Betamax was long gone by 1988. Â
9) Apple Lisa

The Lisa was an amazing computer.  It was the first one to use a GUI and a mouse.  But $10,000 was too much of a price tag.  If you make a phenomenal product, but price consumers out of it, it’s still a failure.Â
10) Apple Pippin
Unfortunately, Apple is rounding out this list. (Two more Apple products after this one.) The Pippin was voted one of the 25 worst tech products of all time. To this day, we don’t know what the Pippin really was. Was it a computer . . . or a gaming console? It was oddly shaped, and it wasn’t all that great at being a computer . . . or a gaming console.Â
Moreover, giving this identity confusion, at $599, it was affordable as a computer, but it was way too expensive as a gaming console.  And, unfortunately, most people thought it was a gaming console. Look at it. It’s a gaming console, right??
You can probably guess that the Pippin lost big to the likes of Nintendo, Sony, and Sega.
11) Macintosh Portable
Lesson #1 in product creation: If you’re going to give a product a certain label, make sure the label FITS the product.Â
If you’re going to call something “portable,” make sure the freakin’ thing is portable!!Â
Does that clunkfest on the left look portable to you? Heck no. This computer lasted two years.
12) Macintosh TV
Computer/TV integration. Great idea, right? It certainly was.  The problem was, I think, that technology wasn’t quite ready to produce something like this in 1993.  People didn’t watch TV on 14-inch screens then; instead, they were buying 40- and 50-inch TVs.  So why buy one of these when you already had a television set that was bigger and looked better.Â
Moreover, it just doesn’t look any different than a regular PC.Â
Only now is the market finally inching closer and closer to computer/TV integration.Â
If you like this post, please consider subscribing to my full RSS feed. You can also subscribe by e-mail and have a copy of each new post automatically delivered to your inbox.Â
18 Responses
Hugo Santos
August 14th, 2008 at 11:05 am
1well. I don’t think Polaroid instant film was a failure. ON the contrary. IT was a huge success. It is no longer a success due to the appearence of digital cameras.
It is like VHS, now obsolete because of DVD…
Hugo Santoss last blog post..The Top 100 blogs Update
Chelle
August 14th, 2008 at 1:13 pm
2I used to have one of those commodore 64’s…loved that thing! Was great for playing tetris!!
I also liked Crystal Pepsi…btw this post makes me feel REALLY old…I remember when all of those things came out! Especially feeling old after seeing those computers (which were “hi tech” at the time!) and remembering how clunky they used to be!
Chelles last blog post..You Have Choices in Your Relationship
Aaron
August 14th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
3I’m with Hugo. Instant Film wasn’t a failure in any sense of the word. I’d love to have a failure of a product that was an absolute icon for 45 years.
BlogSavvy
August 15th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
4Great Post, the fact remains if you look at the list of failed products, they simply revamped some of them, Coke Zero, and AppleTv are just two that have come back better off.
Friday Free-for-all | BlogSavvy.net
August 15th, 2008 at 2:12 pm
5[...] Robert at Flimjo has a great post about 12 Products That Have Failed. [...]
Robert
August 15th, 2008 at 7:20 pm
6Hugo and Aaron: You raise good points. I guess the issue is whether Polaroid could have been more successful if it didn’t annoy so many people? Because it was the only option around, I guess you can say it was successful for a long time. But, like newspapers, it died a quick death (or, at least, newspapers are dying a quick death) when something more modern came along.
Chelle: I liked Crystal Pepsi, too!! It tasted exactly like regular Pepsi. And I, too, feel old.
Blog Savvy: That is a heck of an observation. Sometimes, the best products are just old products that are re-done and re-purposed!
KG Lew
August 19th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
7I remember the arch deluxe… i was a little boy when that happened
lol good memories
Recent Links Tagged With "betamax" - JabberTags
October 5th, 2008 at 7:50 am
8[...] public links >> betamax 12 Products That Have Failed Saved by akiradau on Fri 03-10-2008 Sandwich – Betamax Saved by lpgauthier on Tue [...]
Alexis
December 8th, 2008 at 10:17 am
9ewww…all of these are old and ugly. thank gawd they are not around for my generation!
Brian Allen
February 11th, 2009 at 10:17 am
10all this stuff blows man
Krista
April 22nd, 2009 at 1:35 pm
11The portable thing is freakin amazng. I would’ve bought it,
. I loved itt and wtf is up with the Lisa thingg? Seriously. !
pay day loans canada
August 14th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
12flimjo.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoyed reading flimjo.com.
waqu
August 26th, 2009 at 4:40 am
13sir i think that was a bad move by both the colaaa companies if the customers were going well with old one why they introduce new one without any great difference.
waqu
August 26th, 2009 at 4:42 am
14sir i think that was a bad move by both the colaaa companies if the customers were going well with old one why they introduce new one without any great difference. they canabalize their own brand.
Ben Gaywasds
September 9th, 2009 at 10:43 am
15Fuck this! HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Jodaman
September 13th, 2009 at 9:57 am
16Although these products failed, some companies will go back to their R&D depts. to develop better products because they learned of the errors they made from their failed products and generally come back with a new product that is successful.
I discovered this website by accident and i like it.
Too bad that 1% of responders have no morals at all. Like Ben Gay the responder above…
Hmmm, Ben Gay, isn’t that a medication for rectal problems…
aredDyedo
October 31st, 2009 at 12:08 pm
17Within a scarcely any months, all of those lop of the a candidate for components determination be replaced with a immature latitude of products with settle accounts greater performance.
does lexapro cause heartburn
IN the packs you can pick how baby or how assorted channels you want to have.
nottDeamn
October 31st, 2009 at 10:08 pm
18Jesus was condemning an cost-effective approach that produced so much poverty.
patent expiration lexapro
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: Don’t Worry About Creating The Perfect Product
next post: YouTube Friday – Kiyosaki: Your House Is Not An Asset
to top of page...