03
Mar
2008
Posted by Robert as Investing
Your saved, hard-earned money won’t be enough because the U.S. dollar is losing value at an alarming pace. This is due, in part, to a critical decision by President Richard Nixon in 1971 to take the dollar off the gold standard.Â
History of the Gold Standard
The U.S. and Britain drafted a system of fixed exchange rates in 1944 called the Bretton Woods System. It was enacted in 1946, and this agreement allowed governments to sell their gold to the U.S. treasury at the price of $35/ounce. It made the U.S. dollar an international medium of exchange. People referred to the Bretton Woods System as the “gold standard” because the U.S. dollar was backed by gold. Put another way, the standard value of the dollar was gold. A one dollar bill wasn’t just a piece of paper; rather, it was linked to and backed by a tangible, valuable commodity. Â
End of the Gold Standard
For various reasons, President Nixon took the U.S. off the Bretton Woods System (i.e., off the “gold standard”) in 1971. The U.S. no longer traded gold at $35/ounce and, thus, the link between our currency and commodities was eliminated. As a result, the U.S. dollar became a pure paper asset.
Effect of Taking the Dollar Off the Gold Standard
Eliminating the link between the dollar and gold had several critical effects. The most obvious impact was on the dollar itself.
Without the support of gold backing our currency, the U.S. dollar is as valuable as toilet paper. Well-known investors such as Robert Kiyosaki and Warren Buffett have stated that the U.S. dollar is worthless without pegging it to the gold standard. Â
Instead, our currency is now fiat money. Merriam-Webster’s Online Dictionary defines “fiat money” as “money (as paper currency) not convertible into coin or specie of equivalent value.” Read that closely. Our currency is “not convertible” into something of “equivalent value.” In other words, it is intrinsincally worthless and only has value because the U.S. defines it as a medium of exchange.
How It Affects You
Without a gold standard to back the dollar, inflation goes up.Â
A dollar backed by gold meant low inflation. If the supply of gold stayed the same, the supply of money remained the same.  And the supply of money remained the same because the government could not print more money.Â
Without the gold standard, however, the government is free to print more money. A government that can print money at will is bad news. An increase in the supply of money dilutes its value and accelerates inflation. As inflation increases, the dollars you save in your bank account and your 401(K) lose value. Simply put, inflation wipes out savings.Â
If you spend your whole life saving money, you may end up with nothing because you’re saving a paper currency that has no tangible asset-backed value.  Instead of saving, we have to invest in assets with income-producing value, whether it be real estate, a business, etc. Anything else is a recipe for financial disaster.           Â
If you like this post, please consider subscribing to my RSS feed.
10 Responses
jamy
March 3rd, 2008 at 7:00 pm
1Great post. Stumbled.
Jamy
Robert
March 4th, 2008 at 7:33 am
2Hi Jamy, thanks for the comment! And many thanks for the Stumble. Please come back soon. I post every day, and I cover a wide variety of money-related topics.
eauclaire101
March 11th, 2008 at 11:40 am
3Maybe you could be more positive and say that investing your money is more worthwile than saving it.
Robert
March 11th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
4Hi, and thank you for the comment. You’re right, I could be more positive. I guess negativity was pretty strong. I guess I just got a little fired up about how much chatter there is out there to “save” and invest in a 401(K). But it’s true that we need to emphasize, positively, that some different investing vehicles (like real estate) are needed to secure our retirements.
eauclaire101
March 12th, 2008 at 7:38 am
5I don’t know about investing in Real Estate. That, I would look at negatively at right now. I am pretty successful with http://www.prosper.com/join/eauclaire101 I am earning about 12%, I think. My name is eauclaire101 on the website http://www.lendingstats.com. It is a watchdog website for the other one.
Give yourself some time to understand this website if you are not already familiar with it. I like the concept a lot. Real Estate may seem concrete, but even that can wildly fluctuate in value, as you see happening in California.
Robert
March 12th, 2008 at 9:30 am
6Hey, thanks for the response!
The thing with real estate that I am talking about is not buying and flipping, etc. I mean buying, holding it, and renting it out. If done and researched right, that creates positive monthly cash flow. (I wrote extensively about this process in an earlier post: http://flimjo.com/?p=3). Check it out if you want. That cash flow is also tax-free, believe it or not. That kind of investing can give you a 15%-20% yield and, most important, it can be done whether the market is up or down.
Adam Pieniazek
March 30th, 2008 at 11:19 am
7You’re right that the USD is losing value and fast. It’s not just due to the loss of the gold standard but more so due to the Federal Reserve’s attitude that pumping more money into the economy is the solution to all of its problems (which true, was enabled by removing the gold standard).
We have way too many dollars floating around in the economy and the Fed should be raising the interest rate as it would discourage lending, and thus prevent more money from flooding the market. Instead the Fed decreases the interest rate and props up failing investment banks, which is causing quite a bit more harm than good.
At the root of all these economic issues is public ignorance. I didn’t intend to bring conspiracies into this discussion, but why, in the “most capitalist” nation in the world were we not forced to study economics in high school? If our nation runs on capitalism, shouldn’t we all understand basic business concepts after high school? Does our nation run on capitalism? [No].
If we all understood basic economic principles and thus truly understood what our leaders have done to this once great economy there’d be riots in the streets. Instead the majority of Americans have loaded up on plasma TVs and shiny cars, paid for by piles of debt and not even realized how little their dollar is actually worth.
Sorry for the conspiratorial rant but it’s much more reassuring to me that evil but smart men are behind this rather than naive, dumb leaders.
Your argument to invest in real estate and business is solid, but, if the USD is losing value, the income coming in from the real estate and business is losing value too. And if the economy crashes and your tenants can no longer pay rent, you’re stuck with an asset no one can pay you for. If you invest in a business, and the economy crashes who will pay for your goods and or services?
A recession is the best time to start a business (due to cheap credit) but if the recession continues or is a sign of greater economic problems than just the regular up and down cycles, then your business will be just as worthless as a savings account.
I for one am investing in guns and bicycles, the only assets that don’t lose value even in economic depressions.
Robert
March 30th, 2008 at 11:29 am
8Hey Adam, thanks for the comment. I don’t think you brought any conspiracy into the discussion. So don’t worry about that. It’s true that the income from a real estate or business may be losing value as well, but with real estate you do have an asset that has value. Remember that people still need to live somewhere and, when it comes down to it, the second thing they’ll pony up money or something of value for is a roof over their heads (after food).
As for guns and bicycles, I like the idea. But what about silver and gold? They have real tangible value as a form of currency if the dollar truly plummets.
Adam Pieniazek
March 30th, 2008 at 11:58 am
9Well the guns & bicycles part was a bit of a joke, though it does make sense since you don’t need fuel for a bike (apart from carbohydrates) and guns give you protection that a roof over your head can’t.
Silver and gold are good assets if the economy is doing well. My big question for the upcoming 6-12 months is if this recession is temporary or a sign of a steadily weakening global economy. Gold is valuable because it can be bent and shaped into many forms and is a great conductor for electronics, but if we all start buying less (which overall would be a good thing, our consumerist focus needs to decrease) then gold becomes less valuable too, right?
We’re in a time of uncertainty and in such times, guaranteed assets become very valuable but when we really think about it, there’s no such thing as a guaranteed asset.
If the dollar plummets, what will you trade your gold and silver for? Food? Shelter? Who will take the gold and silver? Because if the dollar truly plummets our economy will shatter and food and shelter will become valuable, and I don’t think the farmers across this country will take gold or silver in exchange for their food.
If it’s just a recession and the dollar starts going back to normal levels in 6-12 months, then yes gold and silver are great assets to hold until then. I’m an economics geek so doomsday economic scenarios are quite interesting but I hope it doesn’t happen as my savings account is in USD!
Robert
March 30th, 2008 at 2:02 pm
10Hey Adam, your economic perspective is a great “asset” to this discussion. I guess you’re right that there are no real guaranteed assets except food.
I don’t think we have a steadily weakening global economy. It’s the U.S. and its over-consumption that’s the problem. We’re certainly heading for a recession (if we’re not already in one) and, possibly, a Great Depression-like scenario. But I think that’s the worst that will happen, and I don’t think it’s impossible to recover from.
Gold is valuable as a safe haven asset when the dollar is doing poorly. However, I think silver is way more valuable because it has so many uses. Farmers may not take it in exchange for food, but they do need tools and farming equipment, right? Even in a doomsday scenario, tangible assets like silver and gold, I think, still have value.
I’d love to hear more of your point of view. I am not an economist, so this stuff is very interesting to me.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
previous post: 10 Differences Between Being Rich And Being Wealthy
next post: 5 Books About The Falling U.S. Dollar
to top of page...